Resolution Financial Advisors · Perspectives

Why the Uniform ABC Act Matters

Assignments for the Benefit of Creditors are governed by a patchwork of state laws. Five perspectives — five reasons a modern, uniform framework preserves value for everyone at the table.

MF
Molly Froschauer Partner · Resolution Financial Advisors
01

Rule 01 · Employees

Protections that don't keep pace aren't protections at all.

When businesses fail, employees are often among the most vulnerable stakeholders — yet employee protections in ABC proceedings vary dramatically by state, and many statutes have not kept pace with modern economic realities.

California ABC wage priority cap
$0

Fixed by statute. It does not adjust — no matter how far labor costs and the cost of living rise.

vs
Bankruptcy Code wage priority cap
Indexed

Adjusted periodically for inflation. The Uniform ABC Act brings ABCs in line with the Bankruptcy Code's adjustments.

TIME → Cost of living Fixed cap

As costs rise, a fixed statutory cap gradually loses practical meaning.

A more modern and uniform framework could provide:

Greater consistency Clearer expectations More predictable outcomes
In insolvency situations, predictability is not just procedural. It affects real people making decisions about rent, healthcare, and whether they can afford to wait for payment.
02

Rule 02 · Buyers

Buyers bid on certainty. Patchwork rules price it out.

Sale procedures, notice requirements, and assignee authority vary significantly from state to state. That inconsistency creates diligence costs and transaction risk for buyers evaluating distressed opportunities — and often a barrier for their financing partners, counsel, or boards.

Patchwork today Uniform framework
Risk

Bids

Lower bids, discounted for process uncertainty

Risk

Timelines

Longer timelines while rules get untangled

Risk

Retrade risk

Increased retrade risk late in the deal

Risk

Bidder pool

Fewer qualified bidders show up at all

Buyers engage aggressively when the process is predictable and the rules are clear. Stronger process certainty doesn't just benefit buyers — it can directly improve recoveries for creditors and preserve more going-concern value overall.

Evaluating a distressed opportunity? Talk to our team →
03

Rule 03 · Secured Lenders

In distress, time itself is a declining asset.

When a business enters distress, time is rarely neutral. Outside the jurisdictions where ABCs are common, many lenders are unfamiliar with the process — and inconsistent state rules create differing timelines, requirements, and expectations depending on where an assignment occurs.

Collateral value over time

Hover the markers — each one erodes value while stakeholders navigate uncertainty

TIME IN DISTRESS → VALUE

For secured lenders, inconsistency can mean:

  • Higher administrative costs navigating unfamiliar, state-specific procedure
  • Longer resolution timelines while collateral loses value
  • Increased litigation risk from unclear rules and expectations
  • Declining collateral value as the clock runs
A uniform framework would not eliminate business risk — but it could reduce process risk, so value is spent solving business problems, not procedural ones.

Navigating a distressed situation? Talk through your options with our team — confidentially.

Contact RFA
04

Rule 04 · Trade Creditors

Vendors feel distress first — and get answers last.

Trade creditors are often the first to feel the effects of a company's financial distress. Because ABC procedures vary by state, the answers to their hardest questions are not always consistent. Tap each question below.

Under a patchwork, vendors guess. A uniform framework gives clearer expectations around notice and administration, so suppliers can make informed decisions about continuing the relationship earlier in the process.
Consistent rules for claims and their administration reduce confusion and minimize disputes — helping creditors understand where they stand instead of litigating over process.
A uniform act clarifies the assignee's role and authority, so stakeholders know who is running the process and who can bind the estate.
Transparent, predictable treatment lets businesses, creditors, and assignees focus on preserving value instead of navigating inconsistent procedural rules.
When creditors understand the process, they're better equipped to participate in it. And when the process is more predictable, everyone benefits.
Questions about a customer in distress? Contact us →
05

Rule 05 · States

Businesses cross state lines. Their insolvency laws should keep up.

Today's businesses operate across state lines, but the laws governing Assignments for the Benefit of Creditors remain anything but uniform. That patchwork creates uncertainty for debtors, creditors, employees, buyers, lenders, assignees, courts — and the professionals guiding businesses through distress.

50 states · 50 different rulebooks

The Uniform ABC Act gives states the opportunity to modernize their insolvency laws while preserving state control over the process — consistency where consistency improves outcomes.

Costs

Reduce transaction costs

Capital

Encourage investment

Value

Preserve enterprise value

Confidence

Strengthen out-of-court restructurings

The question is not whether businesses will continue to fail. They will. The question is whether the legal framework should help preserve value — or create additional procedural uncertainty.
Discuss the Uniform ABC Act with our team →

The Bottom Line

"Business failure will always be disruptive. The legal framework surrounding it does not need to add avoidable friction."

Molly Froschauer · Partner, Resolution Financial Advisors

Talk to Our Team
#Insolvency#Restructuring#ABCs#Turnaround#DistressedInvesting